Trainers' Library Home


View all Categories View All Categories

5 Reasons to Use External Trainers in Your Organisation


I was an in-house trainer for many years and I was a good one even if I do say so myself. But to my utter dismay at times, senior managers would decide to bring external trainers in which often made me quite frustrated and if I'm honest, a little jealous. Ultimately it inspired me to set up my own consultancy and ten years on I've never looked back. So now that I am on the 'dark side' I thought I would share five reasons why actually I wish I had warmed to the idea of external trainers a little more.

Reason Number One: Kudos
Using external trainers adds impact to the message. Whether we like it or not, the perceived importance of the training increases when a specialist external organisation is involved. This means people are more likely to attend, pay attention, value and use what they learned.

Reason Number Two: Impartiality
External trainers will be impartial and objective. They will also be better placed to challenge difficult delegates or those resisting the message, since they do not have a long term working relationship with participants, with all the histories and complications these relationships bring. They will be unable to comment on tired old gripes and grumbles; they can simply capture comments and move the session swiftly on. Where a number of training sessions are being delivered the message is also more likely to be consistent, the external trainers will not feel the need to vary the message depending on who might be in the room. Where a group of external trainers are centrally controlled, trained and reviewed by a dedicated project manager the consistency of message is further guaranteed.

Reason Number Three: Outside Experience
Professional trainers that are in demand will have solid expertise at handling difficult situations and people. They can turn sessions around with a kit bag of anecdotes, stories and challenges. They can speak confidently of what other organisations are doing and shake up the weariest participant or soothe the most disgruntled.

Reason Number Four: Speed
Professional trainers achieve effective learning fast. Utilising principles such as accelerated learning and learning style theory, professional trainers can quickly design and deliver sessions that engage learners and are memorable; thus ensuring the precious time that the participants spend in the training room is not wasted. They may have top quality solutions already waiting that can be tweaked to meet your needs.

Reason Number Five: Cost Effectiveness
Although I baulked at the day rate of external trainers you are paying for flexibility. No loss of in-house resource is needed; let your people continue to do what they do best while the external trainers slot in where and when you need them –giving ultimate flexibility. Often taking internal people away from their role, especially when others are also missing to attend the training, is a false economy.

A word of advice.....
Assuming you have selected a quality provider, the success of your partnership with an external training organisation then lies in your ability to communicate with them. To give them credibility when they first work with your organisation we recommend letting them spend time in the operation, mixing with staff of all levels and building their knowledge of your organisation, its clients and culture. For their credibility to be maintained in the face of adversity and for the best training solutions, we believe this is the single most important factor when working with a new training provider.

Carolyn Blunt is a training consultant for Real Results Training: www.real-results.co.uk


April 8 2013Carolyn Blunt



Carolyn Blunt





Comments:
Rod - it is the perception (Ethos) or the trainer, objectivity, level of knoweledge and dedication. I have an 'interview' with every course i run. I stand or fall on my performance. I cannot have a bad day in the same way in-house generic trainers can. But I agree there is a clear place for both. Many skills need to be taught at a foundation and intermediate level. Then it is time for the expert. I suspect your basic health checks are not carried our by the Consultant - but you want him to carry out the operation! I am so much not an expert in so many areas. I know and accept that. Generic in -house multi-tasking, multi-subject trainers might feel that Jack of all trades is never Master of all trades.
April 18 2013 Previous Member
It's interesting Rod how different organisations operate. I have no issues with perceptions within my company. I write and deliver ILM level 3 and level 5 Leadership and Management programmes. I am both the programme tutor and the assessor. We have many of our directors and senior managers attending these programmes.
I also coach senior members of staff.
I guess we are lucky here as there are 3 of us that share a work load and all have our own expertise in specific areas.
To be honest whether you are an in-house trainer or external trainer I feel that you can possess exactly the same qualities and skills required to produce excellent results for an organisation.
April 18 2013 Previous Member
It’s fascinating that the comments reflect the sort of emotions that Carolyn herself admitted to in her blog. I too, of course, have sat on both sides of the fence, and I completely understand Nemesia’s feelings. In-house trainers are vital in every organisation – whether that’s a formal role or a role taken on (for example in small businesses) by a line manager. But external trainers form an important part of the mix too. I’ve always used external trainers and we’ve used them within Glasstap when, for example we want to bring in a new perspective, or specific experience and skills. It was certainly true when I was an in-house trainer that we needed to be generalist – able to deliver a wide range of training around many core topics. One of the things I liked when I first became a self-employed trainer was the ability to become specialist, as Ian mentions. There is another problem that in-house trainers can face, which has nothing to do with skill, and everything to do with perception. I just asked a colleague who I’ve known for nearly 20 years (and now I feel old) if she could imagine some of our managers from those days attending a course on, for example, leadership, run by me, when directly, or indirectly, I reported into them. She laughed (a little too loudly actually. ;-))
April 17 2013 Rod Webb
Your comments are very interesting Ian...you presuppose and generalise...I would not disagree that an external trainer has it's place...just never under estimate us in-house trainers...you may be very surprised at the amount of our expertise.
April 17 2013 Previous Member
Aha.. the red mist - the justifying cloud of rhetoric. One important point missed is the expertise. Most in-house trainers are covering many courses. They are clearly knowlegeable in some, and have to research and learn quickly for other subjects. As an external trainer, I teach presentation skills in the main. I am an expert - not because I say so, but because I teach, write, train, compete, judge and live Presentation skills. Of course i could teach time management or use of Excel as well as the next in-house trainer - but average is not always sufficient! In-house trainers have their roles... but so do external trainers!
April 17 2013 Previous Member
12

Log In here to comment.