|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To provide participants with an opportunity to reflect - for example, at the end of a year or a project, and learn from the highs as well as the lows.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To provide participants with an opportunity to reflect - for example, at the end of a year or a project, and learn from the highs as well as the lows.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of almost any size.
Useful For: Work-based or project teams.
You'll Need: • Flipchart paper and enough red, green and yellow round sticky dots so that your participants have 5 of each colour. (If you can't source sticky dots, green, red and yellow marker pens will do.)
Notes: This exercise is designed to be run as part of an end of year review, or following the completion of a major project, to enable participants to process what happened, maybe get a few things off their chest, admit areas where they struggled and to celebrate the good parts too. More importantly, it gives individuals and the team as a whole a chance to decide how they will behave going forward as a result of this insight.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • This exercise is designed for the start of a team session that reviews the previous year; in particular what went well, what people struggled with and what they learnt from it.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30 minutes for this module.
Aims: • This exercise is designed for the start of a team session that reviews the previous year; in particular what went well, what people struggled with and what they learnt from it.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of any size.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A balloon for each participant. (It’s preferable to have lots of different colours.) • A whistle or claxon to tell everyone to stop. • You will need a nice (indoor) space for participants to throw their balloons in the air and keep all the balloons airborne.
Notes: You will need to plan a little in advance for this activity and be prepared to send out reminder emails to ensure the pre-exercise task is completed. Larger groups will necessitate a longer running time for the exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To think about what needs to happen to ensure we don't regret the things we didn't do. • To consider the feelings of success, and their impact upon motivation. • To look at the importance of creating objectives that are SMART. • To consider the importance of taking control, and what prevents us doing that. • To provide an opportunity for participants to think about their own short, medium and long-term goals.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To think about what needs to happen to ensure we don't regret the things we didn't do. • To consider the feelings of success, and their impact upon motivation. • To look at the importance of creating objectives that are SMART. • To consider the importance of taking control, and what prevents us doing that. • To provide an opportunity for participants to think about their own short, medium and long-term goals.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: You might want to follow this module with the module entitled Five Balls – Goal Setting and Motivation , which illustrates the value of breaking long-term goals down into short-term achievable chunks.We also recommend you refer to the module Breaking Goals Down, which contains further ideas for building on this module.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To define what effective feedback is. • To introduce participants to the AID model for giving feedback. • To give participants an opportunity to practise giving feedback using the AID model.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To define what effective feedback is. • To introduce participants to the AID model for giving feedback. • To give participants an opportunity to practise giving feedback using the AID model.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • The film: ‘Why Do I Always Get Them?’. (If you don’t have a Trainers’ Library membership that includes the option to stream this film you can purchase a DVD from Trainers' Library.) • Plenty of AIDing Feedback Cards and Blu Tack.
Notes: The video used in this exercise can also be used for customer services training using our module Why Do I Always Get Them? .
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to be able to define coaching and its purpose. • To explain the key differences between coaching and mentoring. • To enable participants to describe a basic coaching model. • To identify the core skills required by effective coaches.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to be able to define coaching and its purpose. • To explain the key differences between coaching and mentoring. • To enable participants to describe a basic coaching model. • To identify the core skills required by effective coaches.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 24 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Plenty of space for participants to work in pairs for this module.
Notes: Endorsed by The National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers, NASBTT.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This is a great introduction to coaching which I used for a group of 6 managers from different parts of the business recently. It opened their eyes to the differences between coaching and mentoring in particular. Whilst practicing during the two days we spent together, the GROW model helped the managers to get in to the right flow. Thanks team - yet another great tool!
|
Lottie Skuthe-Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This module was a great introduction to coaching and the group of managers whom I was working with found it extremely valuable. The exercises challenged them all however they found them useful and interesting and extremely valuable to be able to practice new techniques in a controlled and safe environment. The GROW model is simple and effective and the managers all felt this is a model they could take back to the office and use effectively with their team members; after a little practice! Thank you Glasstap.
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To consider what constitutes unacceptable behaviour in the workplace. • To encourage participants to think about the impact of their own behaviour on others.
About
Time:
The exercise in this module can be completed within 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete the module.
Aims:
• To consider what constitutes unacceptable behaviour in the workplace.
• To encourage participants to think about the impact of their own behaviour on others.
Group Size:
This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For:
Staff at all levels, but especially supervisors and managers.
You'll Need:
Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes:
This module makes the point that is the impact of behaviour that
matters, not the intent. It includes a thought provoking exercise that will
promote discussion of the key learning points.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This exercise is great for starting a discussion about behaviours in the workplace. In an organisation with staff in office, factory and warehouse settings it was interesting to discuss the differences and should the behaviour be more acceptable in one place than another. The importance of context also came out strongly. I loved that the way the exercise is run means the "right" and "wrong" comes from the group, so the trainer doesn't need to be preachy about the topic, and can challenge views by throwing them out to the rest of the group.
I would use this exercise with any group where raising awareness of potentially harmful behaviours would be useful.
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Brilliant exercise for getting delegates into deeper discussions about behaviours and their impact. I also customised some statements to make them relevant to the groups I was working with (using the word template). This made the exercise even more powerful. The client wanted to highlight the differences between Firm Management and Bullying so I used this exercise in conjunction with the article by Sheila Williams.
|
Rosemary Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have run 90 minute Banter and Bullying sessions for 250 people now in 4 organisations. It really helped to have this module as the main focus of the session. It certainly raised awareness of how one persons banter can be another person feeling bad! It works at th simple level of showing how difficult it is to define where the line is, but also helped to make people more likely to intervene if they witnessed problems. It also worked with teams who had many members were English was a second language. Not much extra explanation was needed. Powerfully thought provoking, and really rammed home the "it depends" thinking.
|
Phil Hawthorn
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This activity was used for middle managers who had little or no experience of recruiting staff. This content was used in conjunction with “Take your pick – short listing candidates” The course content was good and easy to use; participants had to think and discuss about colleagues roles. This was used as the first activity of the day which meant everyone could make an input. It showed a link between skills, attitudes and behaviours, how they all inter link and how they are all equally important. The activity was a good discussion basis and I was able to build more into the session from the group discussion afterwards.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I was asked by our board of directors to run a session throughout the company that would highlight how to identify and deal with bullying and harassment. Although we don’t have a problem with this the directors wanted all employees to have the knowledge of how to deal with it if it does happen. I have run this session approximately 25 times now with groups of 4 -10. This mini session was really good and highlighted things that people do and say in everyday life that they don’t realise can often offend people and make them feel “bad” about themselves. Everyone enjoyed this session and the feedback was all positive.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 25 minutes.
Aims: • To understand the importance of listening skills. • To illustrate the dangers of making assumptions. • To provoke discussion about prejudices and stereotypes.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 25 minutes for completion.
Aims: • To understand the importance of listening skills. • To illustrate the dangers of making assumptions. • To provoke discussion about prejudices and stereotypes.
Group Size: Suitable for use with groups of almost any size. This module is also suitable for remote/virtual delivery – see separate note.
You'll Need: • Pens and paper for every participant. • The audio recording of the story, which can be streamed from Trainers’ Library if you prefer not to read it aloud yourself.
Notes: If reading the story to participants, we suggest that you rehearse reading the story aloud a few times prior to delivery. This module has been endorsed by Show Racism the Red Card. For more information about the great work this charity is doing to educate against racism, visit www.theredcard.org .
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
We use this frequently in our leadership training. It is fun and gets varied responses which gets the grouo challenging each other.
|
Laura Otten
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
One of my favourite sessions to run, it really is very effective as helping delegates consider how their thinking might impact their decisions and to consider any in-built prejudices they might along with helping them re-think their behaviours and approaches. It's simple to deliver and the delegates remember it.
|
Yvonne Thompson
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
A simple exercise to run with minimal equipment. I ran this with a team experienced in acknowledging and working with differences. However, they were surprised at how easily they still made assumptions and used past experiences, which impacted their ability to decide on the facts. Ideal activity to ad to and ED&I session a the beginning.
|
Zoe Horwood
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have used this resource a number of times over the years. It was particularly well received when delivered to a group of our lawyers and decision makers. Demonstrating the importance of listening and not making assumptions to improve decision making.
It's one of my favourite exercises to deliver!
|
Marie Mostaeddi
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I love this exercise and have used it a lot over the years working with all levels in a wide variety of organisations. It's amazing to see how quickly people go to the assumption stage and the discussions are so powerful in highlighting what we need to focus on in our every day - at work AND at home!
|
Lottie Skuthe-Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Witches of Glum is one of my most used resources across the whole of Trainers' Library. I use this in many different situations. Listening skills is always good to use this and get everyone up on their feet in a training session and moving about the room as they decide the answers.
It is great for challenging assumptions that people make and works well when using in Equality and Diversity workshops to really get into challenging assumptions in a non confrontational way.
An excellent exercise that is well written and works in many different situations.
|
Ric Hayden
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
A really versatile exercise that is quick, easy and fun. I have used it in communication courses, management programmes and Diversity sessions. It is a good alternative to the Goldilocks exercise. Works really well in getting the point across around not making assumptions and reinforcing the importance of active listening
|
Mike Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
One of my favourite Trainers' Library exercises that never fails to get people thinking, usually in Diversity training. The powerful exercise brings to life how easy it is to make stereotypes and then generates powerful discussion around how this happens in the workplace and the impact it has.
|
Emma Wynne
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have used this exercise many times as part of communication skills modules on leadership development programmes. Although the exercise illustrates the separate topics of the importance of not making assumptions and of active listening, delegates quickly see the link between these and that we all do the aural equivalent of "scan reading" and miss details because we assume.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
As well as using this exercise to illustrate assumptions and stereotypes, I use it in my 'Minute Taking with Confidence' course. I read the story and encourage delegates to take notes (perhaps after a session on speed writing). I then quiz them - and many STILL make assumptions even though they've taken notes (eg the King is old). I then get them to analyse what should be included in the Minutes using ABCD eg what's vitally important (the Absolutes), what are the Basics or the Background to the story, what adds Colour to your minutes to bring the story to life - and what can be left out (the Dumps - eg Christina, the wheelchair etc)
|
Sally Jones
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
What I particularly like about this exercise is that it can be adapted to use in a variety of different sessions. I have already used it as an exercise on assumptions in a module on equality and diversity and I will also be using it in my helpline skills training on effective listening.
The exercise is a fun way to get across an important message, and the recording that is included with the downloads allows the trainer to rest their voice for a short time, which is a bonus for both trainer and trainees in most cases!
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I love this activity it really increases delegates self-awareness on their listening skills and how easily they can make assumptions.
Before I run this activity I get the delegates to score their current listening skills out of 10, and then once they complete the activity then re look at their score to check this is a fair assessment.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I was planning some team-building activities to incorporate into our Business Skills series. I’ve since trialled your Witches of Glum on a group of B1-C1 level participants (Italian professionals, from the same company). The response was great, stimulated lots of discussion about stereotyping and gave way for a fantastic reflection session. All in English - as our business English courses and workshops always are.
One of the interesting 'take-aways' was that the fear of not understanding every word (the B1s) was greatly reduced as they were told they were going to hear a story. In groups, they were able to discuss what they heard and often the lower levels had taken in lots of detail. The problem with stereotyping also arose - which led into discussion about issues with stereo-typing internal and external clients.
As a trainer, I really enjoyed behind able to pick something up and run with it. It was a great time-saver. I could also work on what the activity could offer much more.
I would probably give the activity a 4.5. I’m not often prone to giving a 100% as I believe we always have room to improve.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
We tend to train somewhat cynical engineers who really take a lot of engaging in order to deliver any Soft Skills. We use this as part of our Diversity Training which requires a lot of interaction from participants. This activity is great to disarm all participates from a “we know it already” stance to actually join in and actively participating. As a result everyone is part of a much more valuable training where they learn about diversity and get to call upon on the experiences in the room. A great start to a session! Thanks.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I use this a lot and it is easy to adapt to sessions on appraisals, feedback, objectivity, diversity and especially good where staff/managers are expected to record summary notes from conversations with customers/staff
One option is to get people to do it in pairs as thing brings in the likelihood that one of the pair had the right answer but was talked out of it despite having 'evidence' written down. (influencing)
It is also quite useful, once they have heard the story, to read all 15 statements as a summary and to ask if it sounds like a fair reflection of the story - most agree it is - then by reviewing each statement, participants see that all but two sentences were accurate.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a really great activity, either for a Listening exercise or for going down the Assumptions route. Use it for both Health and Safety training and also on the PTLLS course I run. Excellent!!!
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Terrific. Can be shortened or lengthened as you need. I’ve used it as recommended to explore assumptions in equality settings, but also really well as an icebreaker for an interview skills workshop. Once I’d revealed how badly people listened, we went on to discuss the way some people assume they know what the question is about and don’t listen carefully enough to understand what the interviewer wants. I really liked the audio file, the story was familiar but different enough to be interesting and it made a change than listening to the trainers voice.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Both these modules (Assumptions – The Witches of Glum and Goldilocks – a Listening Exercise) are excellent for demonstrating the need for ‘active’ listening skills and how easy it is to make assumptions and ‘hear’ what you think was said. These modules worked extremely well and prompted lots of interest from the participants and also some key learning points were easily identified. It then required some simple facilitation skills to identify ways to become better listeners and again to highlight some easy steps that everyone could take to improve their skills.
|
Previous Member
|
|
We use the witches of glum as a useful exercise in the induction programme. As our company is a financial retail business we deal with all types customers from all walks of life. We teach new starters that they should not make assumptions on a customer’s appearance. Just because they look scruffy doesn’t mean that they may be poor. By reading out the story it is clear that people make assumptions to what the answers should be rather than actually listening to the facts. I then have a discussion with the group asking them why they made the assumptions and it really makes them think about it.
|
Previous Member
|
|
Successful eyeopener about the danger of making assumptions. One participant remarked afterwards: "I have just realised what a dreadful listener I am", which was a great learning point for all. However, some of the statements are ambiguous and biased towards eliciting an incorrect "true" answer. For example: "The king was an old man who could no longer walk." Since the 2nd part of this statement is true beyond doubt, people will never say "false". I solved this by reducing the statements to only one fact. Some examples: "The king could no longer walk".
|
Previous Member
|
|
The Witches of Glum module was used as an introduction into communication skills with sales trainees. The delegates appreciated the story and questions and quickly learnt through the course about the assumptions they had made and as a result, were easily able to relate this to how they communicate with customers and colleagues. This was an effective module near the beginning of the course; the delegates had an increased awareness of natural assumptions and listening skills which effectively introduced further modules within the course.
|
Previous Member
|
|
This week I ran a seminar for members of the local branch of the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development in Shropshire. The topic for the presentation was “Diversity for Dummies”. This was my first venture into this type of presentation of this topic as I have only recently begun to train in the topic with the Ford Motor Company. As an alternative to risking ‘Death by Powerpoint’ I decided to use “The witches of Glum” as a medium for getting across how easily we drop into making assumptions and the potential impact making those assumptions. I used the exercise exactly as provided and was delighted with the way that those present took to it and enjoyed the different way of making a valuable learning lesson. Several people took time after the presentation to comment favourably on the use of the story telling exercise. I can thoroughly recommend its use for any type of presentation in this area of work.
|
Paul Brennan
|
|
The Witches of Glum exercise has been used within our customer service course. It has allowed us to use a fun exercise to identify the pitfalls of assumptions and stereotypical situations. The delegates have found this to be amusing as it is a clear break away from the business theme of other exercises. The trainers notes are very well laid out and it is what all exercises should be, simple and yet effective.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have recently used this exercise to introduce a session on cultural differences as the organisation was transferring its HR shared service to another country. The training itself was quite challenging as it was perceived to be a big change to how our managers currently operate however, I used the exercise to introduce the final part of the day. This made a considerable difference to the atmosphere and energy levels within the group. They began to understand the assumptions we make about other cultures and they became receptive to altering their communication style to ensure their interaction was effective.
|
Clare Wilkes
|
|
I am constantly amazed by how good this exercise is at highlighting people's ability to make assumptions given a very small amount of information. I've used this in a number of different sessions where it was important to highlight the amazing ability people have to fill in the gaps of the story with their ideas and remembered bits of old fairy tales. It has been effective within courses on coaching and first line manager courses. I have read the questions out from the materials and this worked just as well as writing them all out on the flip chart. This activity is so popular that staff often ask to do it again at other events.
|
Helen Walker
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
We are running a series of sessions on HR Skills for Managers , the first of which deals with Managing Diversity Are You a Fair Manager? Having identified what diversity is the trainer asks the delegates to sit back, listen to a story and expect to answer some questions about the subject afterwards. The story is, of course, Assumptions The Witches of Glum. This is a great little exercise that really demonstrates to the delegates how readily assumptions are made and how guilty of it they are. At least 50% of the delegates get less that 50% of the statements right each time we run the session perfectly illustrating the learning point. Give it a go, youll love the results!
|
Tracy Croft
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore some of the challenges participants will face as a manager and how to approach them with the right balance of ethics and pragmatism.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore some of the challenges participants will face as a manager and how to approach them with the right balance of ethics and pragmatism.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 4 to 18 participants.
Useful For: Learners who are brand new managers (or very soon will be), particularly if they have been promoted from within the team.
You'll Need: • Playing pieces, one per team. • Small prize for the winning team. • 60 second timer or stopwatch. • Facilitator Traffic Lights. • At a Crossroads Conundrum Cards. • At a Crossroads Diversion Cards (3 per team). • At a Crossroads Game Board. • At a Crossroads Suggested Answers (for the facilitator).
Notes: This exercise is suitable for use with groups of up to 18 participants. It is run as a competitive game, which is a race to the finish and played in teams of two or three players. We do not recommend having teams with more than three participants. All the scenarios contained in the cards are based on actual experiences faced by managers in their first year of managing a team. It is a particularly useful exercise for people who have been promoted from within the team to become the manager and who are struggling to adapt to their new role with people who were once their peers.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I recently used this during a two day introduction to management course. The participants loved and it was a great resource to use that was fun but achieved important, relevant learning outcomes. This will be a resource that I will continue to use with the added advantage that the gameboard can be used with the performance management cards, when I run the next course for managers on coaching and mentoring.
|
Sue Bartlett
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
On Tuesday this week I used the At a Crossroads activity from Trainers Library with a group of 4 newly appointed managers.
What a great activity. We had full interaction and the conundrum cards really threw up some challenges that the participants could relate to. It was great to be in control of the traffic lights so that we could really discuss each challenge and hear the different perspectives on how each individual would potentially deal with that challenge.
We didn't get through all the cards, however the participants have asked for round 2 at our next workshop because they enjoyed the activity so much.
I am aware that you can download the road map and cards however I made the small investment and bought the resources from Trainers Library as I know this will be used time and time again.
Great resource, easy & fun to use and definitely encouraged much debate and thinking.
If you've not used it then try it.
|
Pauline Weddell
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This exercise provides a lot of different scenarios for managers to consider how they would respond.
I have used a slightly adapted version of this exercise as a warm up for management development training. I have a series of workshops focussing on different aspects of management behaviours, with the same group of participants each time, and used this as a warm up exercise for workshop 2. Instead of using the board, I asked the teams to pick a card from the deck and read it out. Team A picks and reads then Teams B and C have 30 seconds to come up with a response. Team A picks their favourite response and awards that team a point. Then move on to Team B. I repeat this to cover 9 randomly picked cards. Each card read gives an opportunity for discussion around the best way to handle the situation.
As there are so many cards, I will probably repeat this as the warm up for workshops 3 and 4 too.
Another great resource from Trainers' Library!
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore some of the challenges participants will face whilst managing the performance of individuals in their team.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore some of the challenges participants will face whilst managing the performance of individuals in their team.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 4 to 18 participants.
Useful For: Anyone who is responsible for the performance of others, or who soon will be.
You'll Need: • Playing pieces, one per team. • Small prize for the winning team. • 60 second timer or stopwatch. • Facilitator Traffic Lights. • Conundrum Cards. • Diversion Cards (3 per team). • Game Board. • Suggested Answers (for the facilitator).
Notes: This exercise is suitable for use with groups of up to 18 participants. It’s run as a competitive game and is a race to the finish. Played in teams of 2-3 players - we do not recommend having teams with more than 3 participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I recently used this activity as part of a development centre for aspiring leaders. It was really well received by the group. We had about 18 people split into 6 teams. The intention had been to run the activity for 45 minutes but the group enjoyed it so much it went on for over an hour and we still hadn't got close to a winner. The scenarios generated lots of debate. I would perhaps suggest starting with smaller groups at first as it is difficult to facilitate with such large group sizes
I used the board game pack that I purchased, and whilst this did provide a nice visual to accompany the activity, the conundrum cards would have worked perfectly well without the board game if used as discussion topics. An excellent activity that is guaranteed to get the group engaged (Just make sure your answer sheet matches your conundrum cards!)
At the end of the session the group asked for a further full days session dedicated to discussing these types of scenarios and for me that says it all about how good the activity is.
|
Mike Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the link between attitudes and beliefs, and results. • To identify the need to take responsibility for our own results. • To build an understanding of what individuals might be capable of, if they adopt a positive attitude, and push themselves a little more.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To consider the link between attitudes and beliefs, and results. • To identify the need to take responsibility for our own results. • To build an understanding of what individuals might be capable of, if they adopt a positive attitude, and push themselves a little more.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This exercise includes mention of the story of Malala Yousafzai. Depending upon your audience, you may wish to substitute it for another story that resonates with your participants. If you do use a different story, it is important that you choose ones that will be well known to your participants and which will highlight an individual who has overcome significant hardship to achieve something of genuine importance.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants understand what their leadership (and followership) style is through physicalising part of the leadership process.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50-60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75-90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To help participants understand what their leadership (and followership) style is through physicalising part of the leadership process.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of any size, however the exercise works much better with larger groups.
Useful For: Managers, directors and others in leadership roles.
You'll Need: • Blindfolds. • A large, empty space (see notes).
Notes: This exercise can provide participants with a very different insight into their leadership style (and their style as a follower). It is particularly useful for exploring trust and being hands on and hands off. You need a large, empty space for this exercise. Any chairs should be placed against the walls of the room, leaving as much space as possible. It is possible to do this exercise outside, for example on a lawn. There is the risk of people knocking into each other, a wall or furniture in this exercise. Make clear that participants guiding another colleague are responsible for that participant’s safety at all times. * Although you can run this exercise with less than 8 participants it works much better with larger groups.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To show participants how we tend to mirror the body language of others when rapport is established. • To discuss what happens to body language when rapport is absent.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 10 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To show participants how we tend to mirror the body language of others when rapport is established. • To discuss what happens to body language when rapport is absent.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of almost any size.
Useful For: Staff at all levels. It can be used with people who don't know one another at all, or who have met/worked together previously.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this activity as an icebreaker to Negotiating and Influencing Skills; it worked well because this course followed from Assertive Skills so it acted as a good link between the two. Delegates commented that they found the activity interesting and will naturally be more aware of people’s body language in every day life in future. This activity works well with small or large groups so long as there are enough for 3 in each group.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To show the value of breaking goals down into smaller chunks. • To provide participants the opportunity to practise breaking long-term goals down into a series of short term objectives.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 35 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To show the value of breaking goals down into smaller chunks. • To provide participants the opportunity to practise breaking long-term goals down into a series of short-term objectives.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: We have provided you with a suggested Gap Analysis about learning to juggle. If your participants all work in a similar role or for the same organisation, you might wish to substitute this example with one that is more relevant to your participants.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To demonstrate the importance of determination in building resilience. • To identify what determination is and where it comes from. • To list some of the key factors that help make people more determined. • To identify ways to become more determined.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 30 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To demonstrate the importance of determination in building resilience. • To identify what determination is and where it comes from. • To list some of the key factors that help make people more determined. • To identify ways to become more determined.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of any size.
Useful For: Staff and managers at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider planning and preparation as part of leadership. • To facilitate discussion around playing to the team's strength. • To consider factors that motivate staff to perform well. • To encourage staff to self assess, review and reflect on performance. • To encourage leaders to consider their communication skills. • To encourage leaders to consider the question of keeping people motivated. • To demonstrate leadership skills in a practical task.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 55 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider planning and preparation as part of leadership. • To facilitate discussion around playing to the team's strength. • To consider factors that motivate staff to perform well. • To encourage staff to self assess, review and reflect on performance. • To encourage leaders to consider their communication skills. • To encourage leaders to consider the question of keeping people motivated. • To demonstrate leadership skills in a practical task.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: First line managers and supervisors.
You'll Need: • Broadsheet newspapers (one per team). • Sticky tape (one per team). • A tennis ball.
Notes: In this exercise, participants will be working in teams of 4 or 5. Each team will need one broadsheet newspaper (for example, the Financial Times) and a roll of sticky tape. In addition, you will need a tennis ball (or similar) to test the strength of the teams’ structures.
Label
Reviews |
|
I ran this as an icebreaker for a couple of reasons, firstly I had 1 manager on screen from our India team - and secondly we have some managers who are very hands on and do a lot of the doing, leaving them little time to lead their team.
It worked brilliantly by appointing the remote manager as a Team Leader as he couldn't physically contribute to the activity and choosing another manager for the opposite team that has a development need around stepping away and letting her team work through cases.
I used 5 sheets of flip paper per team (didn't have newspapers) and this worked perfectly.
The de-brief worked brilliantly, especially with targeted questions to the team leaders and "their team"
Lots of laughter, but a great focus on time management and linked to service level agreements we have, quality assurance, motivation and leadership.
I'll definitely be running this one again.
|
Helen McGowan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this activity for a teambuilding exercise and it really defalted the team. I think it is important for the team to be in close proximity even in separate rooms. I think it works better for the teams to be in the same room in corners of the room. A lot of running around for the facilitator and a lot of newspaper is needed!
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
I've used this activity twice: once as a leadership exercise and once for teambuilding (requiring only a slight change in emphasis on the debrief). Students want to get straight onto the bridge-building phase rather than spend time on planning their bridge. However, when debriefed, they comment that they understand the importance of planning, and recognise that it's something they perhaps need to do better in their day jobs. This often comes from the team who don't succeed with the task - they acknowledge that better planning (and also leadership) could have helped. Using it as a leadership activity, you can focus in the debrief on the role of the leader, on leadership styles/approaches, and what it might have felt like had they not had a leader. For teambuilding, you can still draw out issues about leadership (because someone in the group might have evolved as a natural leader, without having been appointed, and this is something you might want to comment on) as well as focusing on the positives of teamworking - so if you are running this activity with a team who are not working well together, you could praise them (without patronising) on how well they worked together to build their bridge. It can be adapted easily with or without appointing a leader, or observers. I ran it with much shorter time-frames than recommended - only 10 minutes for planning and 20 minutes to build the bridge, but it still worked - it just got participants working harder and faster. There's a real energy in the room as teams strived to build a better bridge than their competitors! (You can always make the point of course, that they were asked to build a strong bridge, not to beat their competitors, but inevitably the element of competition will appear!). Leave the bridges on show for the remainder of the training course/week - they're a talking point. I even had one team nominating someone to "body pop" underneath the bridge to music from their iPod - real flair, creativity, leadership and teamworking coming out.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise very successfully when training a group of new managers on communication styles and teamwork. The exercise was very simple to run and needed very few props - and those which it did need were inexpensive and readily available - perfect!. The groups had a lot of fun and it was really interesting to notice the creative thought process - I guess the exercise could also be used for problem solving situations. We used an observer for each group who was able to give great feedback on the group dynamics and interactions - picking up on key words and phrases used which were useful - and of course, those which were not so useful. The exercise demonstrated the key learning that I wanted to draw out - it was quick - and the group had a load of fun doing it. Can't get better than that really.
|
Rosemary Taylor
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To define counselling skills. • To build an understanding of the difference between counselling skills, the counsellor and a disciplinary interview. • To identify situations where the use of counselling skills might be appropriate.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To define counselling skills. • To build an understanding of the difference between counselling skills, the counsellor and a disciplinary interview. • To identify situations where the use of counselling skills might be appropriate.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Managers and team leaders.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce participants to the subject of delegation. • To explore what constitutes effective and ineffective delegation. • To consider best practice when delegating. • To identify some pitfalls to avoid when delegating.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed within 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To introduce participants to the subject of delegation. • To explore what constitutes effective and ineffective delegation. • To consider best practice when delegating. • To identify some pitfalls to avoid when delegating.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Team Leaders and managers.
You'll Need: • Plenty of blank sheets of A4 paper.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Even with my poor amateur dramatic skills then this is a great exercise. It is fun to run, energises the group and as with all TL exercises generates powerful discussion and learning points. Have used this for years and everyone is always so proud of their boats and often take them home!
|
Emma Wynne
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This session was brilliant. Such a visual and real activity that got everyone understanding how to effectively delegate. The frustration of so many of the delegates allowed for a very amusing activity which was enjoyed by all.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This activity worked brilliantly for stirring up responses.
I was very vague about what was expected in the boat building activity and then immediately made myself unavailable. The end result was really interesting - some delegates were so irritated they couldn't ask questions and with was such little information to go on they refused to build a boat. They felt it was a waste of time trying, because they just didn't know enough to do a good enough job. Brilliant for generating learning points.
Great thing was, there was an aeroplane in the fleet of boats, on the basis that, 'I know how to make a paper plane so I'd prefer to do that well, than make a bad boat'
This drove some really interesting behaviours.
|
Julia Anyan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I was delivering a course on delegation and needed to emphasise the point of poor delegation to the group that was in the training. This activity is excellent to do this. Sink or Swim is based around an imaginary organisation called Bob’s boats, where delegates are given A4 paper with little clear instruction and asked to build boats. The poor instructions and the role play that is used to demonstrate a lack of enthusiasm for their efforts is a great way to demonstrate how delegation should not be done. Everyone who did the exercise really enjoyed it, and it really made the delegates think about how delegation could be improved.
|
Shaun Gagie
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
It is always popular with delegates and shows brilliantly how poor delegation can lead to problems including frustration, confusion and most importantly not getting the job done that was wanted. It demonstrates the important learning points whilst being great fun – a brilliant mix. We have also used this for train the trainer courses in terms of not training people properly.
|
Emma Wynne
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Just a few thoughts on 'Sink or Swim'. I ran the exercise as part of a section on delegation with a group of team leaders - all of whom had expressed an interest in improving their delegation skills. The first section requires minimal materials - handouts, a supply of plain paper - and is easy to set up. After the initial shock, the delegates threw themselves into [the exercise] with varying degrees of success and enthusiasm while I was 'out to lunch'. The review of the exercise was very effective, bringing out how not to do it and for generating thoughts on more effective means of delegation. The next phase was an evaluation of what successful delegators do. This worked well with the review slides supplied with the exercise. The final part (the story around the Tsunami) worked well as a reminder about setting boundaries and empowering delegatees. I found the exercise took about forty-five minutes. At the end I also added some discussion and slides around the benefits of delegation and reasons why we don't delegate. These generated some 'lively' discussions. In future courses, I may have these discussions, before the exercise. All in all a really good exercise for delegates to experience and think about delegation. Thanks Trainers Library!
|
Nigel Baynes
|
|
I've used Bob's Boats which was a successful excercise for Delegation and left many of the participants actually wanting to finish making their boats after the course had finished! It was a good excercise to get everyone involved and participating and helped them understand the importance of always making sure that the tasks delegated have been followed up.
|
Previous Member
|
|
Bob's Boats always, always gets the most amazing response. One client I visit where I used it about 3 years ago I still get comments "here's Bob's or Burton's Boats". What fantastic recall.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To understand why we delegate. • To understand how to delegate effectively.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 15 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30-45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand why we delegate. • To understand how to delegate effectively.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A supply of Lego, with at least 15 large pieces for each team of 3-5 participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library - Building an Understanding of Delegation .
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To show participants a five-step model that will help them establish the need for a difficult conversation and plan for a successful outcome.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 15 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To show participants a five-step model that will help them establish the need for a difficult conversation and plan for a successful outcome.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Anyone.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To create a situation where participants have to manage change driven by one department, affecting the work of another. • To identify some key learning points about managing change. • To test information gathering and sharing skills. • To demonstrate the importance of effective questioning, summary and clarification and active listening. • To consider the pros and cons of different leadership styles.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 70 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To create a situation where participants have to manage change driven by one department, affecting the work of another. • To identify some key learning points about managing change. • To test information gathering and sharing skills. • To demonstrate the importance of effective questioning, summary and clarification and active listening. • To consider the pros and cons of different leadership styles.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Each team will need a space to work where they cannot be overheard by the other team (s). • Each HR team will need an egg timer that takes 3-4 minutes for the sand to pass from one side to the other.
Notes: As well as useful in programs concerned with change, this exercise can also be used as a general communication exercise, or in training concerned with internal customer care.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library - Dinner Party Mayhem - Managing Other Teams .
Label
Reviews |
|
I recently used this team exercise as part of a companywide team-building programme. The delegates included senior leaders, all people leaders and key subject specialists. The framework for the programme was Patrick Lencioni's '5 Dysfunctions of a Team' and my challenge was to find an exercise that demonstrated how ambiguity can impact negatively on individuals' commitment in a team. The exercise was run in two cohorts and was equally successful in each. The simplicity of the exercise is the key; all the competing teams have to do is arrange a seating plan; however they only have partial information. Some of the missing information provided in a hurried and unsystematic way by the 'HR' team was vital. The frayed emotions and frustration were very real, which made this feel 'real life' rather than a training exercise. I would recommend its use for team-building, post-restructuring culture building and in leading change through uncertain conditions.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used it as the very first activity in a one-day module of our Leadership Development program called “Communication for Change”. What I liked about it was that it could be run with almost no preparation – just print out the briefs, give them to the teams, and away they go. The teams did all the stereotypical things while participating that gave us some great discussion in the debrief – e.g. confusion about what the other team was doing, poor communication, competitive streaks coming to the surface, time wasting through lack of information sharing, too much focus on the task and not enough on the people etc. It was a great intro to our workshop, and was extremely engaging for the participants. Next time I would probably elaborate a bit more on the briefing to make it clearer that it is a CHANGE. For example, that the dinner party was all organised but then the restaurant changed the tables available etc. This would make a slightly smoother transition into the program topic I’m including it in. Overall it worked really well and generated very useful discussion. I will definitely continue to include it in this program.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
This exercise did not work very well as it was far too easy with the corporate team solving the problem within 10-15 minutes, therefore not having to adjust to any change. Further complications could be added in order to make the exercise more challenging, such as reduction in time or the facilitator acting as the HR team and taking a variety of approaches to directing change. The current time of 45 minutes to complete the exercise is far too long. I recognised this and reduced it to 30 minutes yet this was still too long and the learners felt that they got nothing from the exercise, other than demonstrating how clever they were!
|
Nick Lennon-Barrett
rated this item with 2 stars.
|
|
If you want a great activity to use for topics on change management, this is the one. From understanding change, planning change and implementing change, this activity has the versatility to be used around any of these topics. When I first joined trainer’s library I used it nearly every month for about 2 years – a great activity that can really help delegates understand how individuals react differently to change. I do feel that it is Important to have 2 facilitators so that notes can be made on the behaviours people demonstrate during the activity. A brilliant activity that I continue to go back to…
|
Gary Shewan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 150 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to understand how investigations into an alleged disciplinary or grievance should be carried out.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 90 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 150 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to understand how investigations into an alleged disciplinary or grievance should be carried out.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants.
Useful For: All managers.
You'll Need: • Copies of your internal investigating/disciplinary procedures if you are using these. • Copies of the ACAS Code of Practice Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure if you are using this – available as a free download from http://www.acas.org.uk.
Notes: In this module, participants carry out an investigation into an alleged disciplinary offence and make a decision about what to do next. We recommend that you follow it up with the module Disciplinary Part 2 , which uses the same scenario and deals with what happens after the investigation is completed.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to know how to plan, run and provide a fair outcome for a disciplinary meeting.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 30 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to know how to plan, run and provide a fair outcome for a disciplinary meeting.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants.
Useful For: Anyone who is responsible for the performance of others at work. It will also be useful for those who may have to chair disciplinary meetings.
You'll Need: • Copies of your internal investigating/disciplinary procedures if you are using these. • Copies of the ACAS Code of Practice Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure if you are using this – available as a free download from http://www.acas.org.uk.
Notes: This module can only be run as a follow up to Disciplinary - Part 1 .It is suitable for large and small companies. The answers provided here reflect the legal minimum for the UK. You may want to amend/add to these answers in the light of your country’s legal requirements or your organisation’s policies.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To consider how a disciplinary policy/procedure should be used in practice. • To help participants identify the skills and behaviours they should adopt as managers when involved in a disciplinary procedure.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To consider how a disciplinary policy/procedure should be used in practice. • To help participants identify the skills and behaviours they should adopt as managers when involved in a disciplinary procedure.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Line managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module has been written with best practice in the UK in mind. Please be aware when using this module that legislation affecting this area tends to be updated frequently and that the legal position in countries outside of the UK may differ. All trainers should check the current situation and their organisation’s policies with a HR professional before running this module. For UK customers, the ACAS website is very helpful: www.acas.org.uk.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants understand the benefits of having a disciplinary procedure. • To help participants learn about the organisation’s procedure and their responsibility within it.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 60 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 120 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To help participants understand the benefits of having a disciplinary procedure. • To help participants learn about the organisation’s procedure and their responsibility within it.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels and line managers in particular.
You'll Need: • Copies of the organisation's disciplinary policy and procedures.
Notes: This module has been written with best practice in the UK in mind. Please be aware when using this module that legislation affecting this area tends to be updated frequently and that the legal position in countries outside of the UK may differ. All trainers should check the current situation and their organisation’s policies with a HR professional before running this module. For UK customers, the ACAS website is very helpful: http://www.acas.org.uk. This module is intended to introduce participants to their organisation’s disciplinary procedure in a way that helps them to understand it and importantly, understand the benefits of having it – to themselves, the staff and the organisation as a whole. This module can be used as a starting point for a Discipline and Grievance workshop, or indeed as a stand alone module to introduce participants to the ‘What’ and the ‘Why’ so that at least they have comfort in that knowledge.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To agree the important principles of effective delegation. • To review and learn from the experience of being delegated to. • To recognise potential barriers to delegation. • To prepare a checklist for effective delegation. • To identify tasks that can’t be delegated. • To plan for delegation.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed within 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 120 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To agree the important principles of effective delegation. • To review and learn from the experience of being delegated to. • To recognise potential barriers to delegation. • To prepare a checklist for effective delegation. • To identify tasks that can’t be delegated. • To plan for delegation.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and junior managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: A useful discussion based exercise that encourages participants to really think about when to delegate, why to delegate and when not to delegate.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this exercise in management development programmes and it generates some very interesting discussion, revealing a great deal about how and what managers delegate. For the statements exercise I copied the statements onto pieces of card and asked them to sort the cards into 4 piles. This makes it easier for me to 'eavesdrop' on groups and see what decisions they have already made. I give them the sheet at the end to make any notes.
|
Helen Walker
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the purpose of performance appraisal systems. • To identify the benefits of a good performance appraisal process.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 40 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the purpose of performance appraisal systems. • To identify the benefits of a good performance appraisal process.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and above.
You'll Need: • Post it notes and flipchart paper.
Notes: This module assumes an appraisal process that works on a partnership basis, where objectives are agreed and where skills/behaviours are analysed in order to identify further training and development needs.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To raise awareness of self-awareness, the first strand of emotional intelligence.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To raise awareness of self-awareness, the first strand of emotional intelligence.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A flipchart, pens and the handouts provided.
Notes: This module forms part one of a two-part introduction to emotional intelligence. (Part 2 can also be used alone to explore awareness of others and empathy as a skill.) This module (Part 1) looks at intra-personal intelligence - self-awareness - and the ability to notice and regulate or manage our own emotional state or mood. Part 2 examines interpersonal intelligence – being able to distinguish other people’s emotions, moods and temperaments. It is important to have an understanding of emotional intelligence and the effects of discussing it with a group of participants. You will find Mike Bagshaw’s Article in Trainers’ Library useful for this.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module alongside part 2 with a group of staff who became more expressive with their emotions (at detriment to each other) following a period of change. It was a really useful, non-threatening introduction to self awareness before moving on to part 2.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I recently used this module for team leaders and deputy team leaders when delivering a session on Emotional Intelligence. The grades of emotions exercise worked very well. It was good to share how aware the delegates were of others emotions and how their own behaviour can influence others. I received a lot of positive feedback following the session.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 100 minutes.
Aims: • To develop an understanding of the importance of awareness of others, the second strand of emotional intelligence. • To allow participants to practice empathy as a skill.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed in about 80 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 100 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To develop an understanding of the importance of awareness of others, the second strand of emotional intelligence. • To allow participants to practice empathy as a skill.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module forms Part 2 of a two-part introduction to emotional intelligence. This part examines interpersonal intelligence – being able to distinguish other people’s emotions, moods and temperaments. Part 1 looks at intra-personal intelligence - self-awareness and the ability to notice and regulate or manage our own emotional state or mood. This module can also be used alone, for example as part of a customer service skills course, to explore the importance and value of empathy as a skill. Before using this module it is important to have an understanding of emotional intelligence and the effects of discussing it with a group of participants. You will find Mike Bagshaw’s Article in Trainer’s Library useful for this.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module following part 1, for a team to be more aware about how their own emotions may affect others, and how they can empathise with each other. One of the learning points that came out was the fact they used these skills with their 'clients' but not with one another. I'm going to use it again as part of a Resilience session.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this module along with Part 1 Self-Awareness when running a session on emotional intelligence. The empathy exercise in this module worked really well it worked well to discus the difference between empathy and sympathy and how you don't have to agree with someone to be empathetic and what it felt like to get feedback with empathy and then with no empathy. i received some positive feedback following the session.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 105 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce managers to the subject of employee engagement. • To help managers begin to understand why employee engagement is central to being a successful manager.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 70 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 105 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To introduce managers to the subject of employee engagement. • To help managers begin to understand why employee engagement is central to being a successful manager.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants. Ideally, you'll have at least 6 participants though so that you can create 3 teams of 2 or more.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: • Prepared flipcharts with simple 'cartoon' faces drawn on them - one face for each participant. • Post-it notes.
Notes: This exercise is designed for the start of an Employee Engagement workshop. Before the participants arrive – create a flip chart or charts with colourful cartoon faces on. Please have enough faces so that there is one for each participant. Have these on display at the start of the exercise. There are two parts to this exercise. It is essential that both are completed to ensure that learning is maximised.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This was a good exercise for looking at the difference between satisfaction, motivation and employee engagement. I used this exercise after first sharing and looking at what employee engagement was about and with hindsight I wish I had done the exercise first. All three teams really wanted to engage with staff not just satisfy - it was a great exercise, with effort and participation high (the presentations were brilliant)and Employee Engagement was top priority on the learning outcome. But maybe the learning of the differences between the 3 areas was a little lost - note to self do the exercise first next time :).
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I found this module very useful and received some positive feedback from the delegates. The Marvelous Zoo exercise worked really well looking at the three different approaches, satisfying staff, motivating staff and engaging staff and how it all fits together.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
A great module, I have used it twice and each time the result has been positive. The exercise enables the delegates to quickly identify the difference between satisfied, motivated and engaged employees. Great to use with the other modules. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 105 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage managers to identify the factors that will make their teams feel that they value the organisation they work for and are valued in return.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 70 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 105 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage managers to identify the factors that will make their teams feel that they value the organisation they work for and are valued in return.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: No additional materials are required but the final part of the exercise requires space for participants to move around the room.
Notes: The exercises allow space for participants to reflect on the engagement of a team of up to 15 employees. If their team is bigger than this, encourage them to think about their best and worst performing team members. Whilst this module can be run as a stand-alone exercise, it is most powerful when used with the other exercises in the Employee Engagement series. This complete course can be run in one day or in 4 bite-sized sessions.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module along side the part 1 'whats in it for me' I had a mix of experienced and inexperienced leaders. It was a good way of making them think about their team members and how they can increase the level of engagement in both the organisation and their job.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This module asks the delegates to consider their own team members and encourages them to consider ideas and suggestions on how to increase the levels of engagement on their teams. The Managers I was working with where inexperienced and I found they did needed quite a lot of direction. Very worthwhile and I would definitely use again. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the role that managers’ behaviours play in employee engagement. • To identify the behaviours that lead to more engaged teams. • To consider the impact this has on success.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 80 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore the role that managers’ behaviours play in employee engagement. • To identify the behaviours that lead to more engaged teams. • To consider the impact this has on success.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently).
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module along side employee engagement 1 and 2. The delegates enjoyed the behaviour cards exercise. The team leaders were quite surprised at how different the order of the cards came out and found that it was a good way of showing that you need to tailor your approach for each individual member of the team to get the best out of them. They also found the rosebud case study exercise beneficial.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants understand what it feels like to be engaged in their job and the difference it makes to how they feel and the quality of their work.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To help participants understand what it feels like to be engaged in their job and the difference it makes to how they feel and the quality of their work.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 16 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: • A Bridge Constructor Kit for each team. • A separate area for each team to work in, where they will be out of sight of the other team(s).
Notes: It is advisable to start this exercise without too much introduction – just hand out the briefings and let them get on with it. Whilst this works very well as a stand-alone exercise, we thoroughly recommend using it in conjunction with Employee Engagement 1 , Employee Engagement 2 and Employee Engagement 3. .
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this several times on a management training programme when we focus on employee engagement. It has always been met with great enthusiasm and learning outcomes achieved whilst having fun. There have been some very imaginative wobbly bridges created. Great way to end a day.
|
Sue Bartlett
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I use this as part of a course on Employee Engagement. The delegates absolutely love the exercise. The difference in the results from the two groups is really striking. The de-brief at the end always helps highlight the importance of considering how we communicate with others and the impact on their levels of motivation, engagement and ultimately on what they produce. Making a direct connection between engagement and output really helps to focus managers minds on why employee engagement is so important. An excellent exercise, would highly recommend
|
Mike Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This exercise was a lot of fun and went down really well with a group of team leaders. It was good to see the different approaches used when building the bridge and the reactions when they realised they had slightly different briefs. It was really good on enfolding how much impact a manager has when engaging with their staff. I would defiantly recommend this exercise along with Employee engagement 1,2 and 3.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a really fun and interactive activity to help delegates understand the role of the manager in driving engagement. The debrief at the end of the session is extremely valuable in understand the impact engagement has on performance.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I did this activity in conjunction with the other Employee Engagement modules and it worked a treat. The learning was fantastic and the feedback was great. I can't wait to use again in the next few weeks. Excellent. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a fab activity that, when used in conjunction with the activity ‘Employee Engagement 4, really gets the ‘engagement’ message across. I haven’t used it for employee engagement (yet!) but I have amended the activity slightly and used it to explore member engagement. It went down really well with the participants, they enjoyed doing something different other than discussion etc and took a lot from the learning points of the activity. It particularly made them think about the importance of engaging others by moving out of their comfort zone when planning events rather than putting on events that they are comfortable with. I think this is going to quickly become one of my favourite activities.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Came across this just at the right time - very fortuitous! With some script adaption used this as a team building exercise within a health and social care context. Materials came from my 'Blue Peter' box as well as some of the recommended ones. Worked really well and was very powerful. Did exactly what it said on the tin! Another 5* product from Glasstap. How did I ever cope without you!!
|
Robert Corteen
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To explore how engaged participants are currently feeling at work. • To create an action plan for the workplace that will improve employee engagement.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore how engaged participants are currently feeling at work. • To create an action plan for the workplace that will improve employee engagement.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Work-based teams.
You'll Need: • The 10 Engaging Behaviours posters (Handout provided). 20 red counters (or similar) and 20 green counters for each participant. (We’ve provided a template should you wish to use paper counters.) • An envelope for each poster. (We recommend numbering these to make it easier to keep the poster and correct envelope together.)
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the differences between bullying behaviour and that of firm management. • To understand the impact of organisational culture and norms on managers' behaviour.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore the differences between bullying behaviour and that of firm management. • To understand the impact of organisational culture and norms on managers' behaviour.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and team leaders.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: Different countries have different definitions of workplace bullying. You will find it helpful to check for yourself the current definition and any legislation or best practice guidelines applicable to your country and to have these available to share with your participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I've used this exercise for internal (same org) groups and mixed org and variable experience groups too.
It relies on the groups to have clear views and constructive discussion, which in some cases need nurturing and encouragement, however it does create a clear structure for the trainer to use as discussion points and lead anyone struggling.
It is particularly useful for reviewing cultural norms and expectations and for exploring the difficulty of the 'grey areas' which in some cases have led to heated (and valuable!) discussions around acceptable behaviours. it's often easier to spot the negative than the positive - and is helpful for learning from others' good techniques.
|
Helen Ettridge
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Have used this repeatedly with different levels of managers, and found most of them relieved that it’s OK to be a firm manager sometimes. As the worksheet says, some examples are obvious, but the themes like ‘people knowing where they stand’ were good to discuss. I extended it a bit by asking people to generate and/or review their own case study examples (anonymised first).
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce (or remind participants of) SMART objectives. • To give participants the opportunity to practice writing SMART objectives.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 35 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To introduce (or remind participants of) SMART objectives. • To give participants the opportunity to practice writing SMART objectives.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module can be used to introduce SMART for participants who have not encountered the acronym before, or as a refresher for those who have.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to notice examples of unhelpful feedback, both positive and negative in the film clips. • To encourage participants to adopt helpful feedback in their own dealings with staff.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 60 minutes (including the time required to view the training video). In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 80 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to notice examples of unhelpful feedback, both positive and negative in the film clips. • To encourage participants to adopt helpful feedback in their own dealings with staff.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants, split into smaller teams, as long as suitable projection facilities are available to give everyone a clear view of the training video.
Useful For: Managers at all levels, supervisors and team leaders.
You'll Need: • A computer and a means of connecting to a screen.
Notes: We recommend showing each clip of film in turn and drawing out the learning points. There is a further activity to relate the learning to participants’ own work situations. Please note that these are the trainer notes that accompany the Trainers' Library video 'Giving Feedback', exclusively available to customers with an Essential, Pro or Enterprise membership.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To demonstrate a link between self-belief and results. • To encourage participants to consider the impact positivity has on their own performance and the performance of others.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To demonstrate a link between self-belief and results. • To encourage participants to consider the impact positivity has on their own performance and the performance of others.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A syndicate room, or separate area in which Team 1 can work. • A pack of 54 ‘Filing Frenzy’ cards for each team. • A stopwatch/timer. • You might like to use a bell or whistle to announce the start/end of the exercise.
Notes: This exercise may not be suitable for participants who are colour blind or visually impaired. However, in most cases anyone who falls into this category can still be involved. Ask them to observe/listen to the teams during the exercise, identifying effective and less effective behaviours in order to provide constructive feedback afterwards.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims:• Understand the difference between leadership and management and the importance of both. • To identify ways that participants can lead and manage their most important team members.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module. Aims:• Understand the difference between leadership and management and the importance of both. • To identify ways that participants can lead and manage their most important team members. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants. Useful For: Participants with current (or imminent) managerial responsibility. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This exercise is a great way to open up a workshop about leadership. It removes the need for the more traditional participant introductions and enables you to observe the participants in action and explore their priorities and attitudes to managing people. You can run this exercise with a range of team sizes, with between 4 and 8 players in each team. Please select the correct Clue Card pack based on the number in the team. Choose the team sizes that work for you. For example, with a group of 15, the exercise can be run with 3 teams of 5 or 2 teams, one of 7 and the other 8.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in a Leadership workshop and it was helpful to get people to think about what a leader needs to do when taking action with the team and its development. All of the teams came up with different priorities which sparked off considerable discussion about what areas to prioritize especially if you are a new manager. You really need to help at the start with communication as some groups were not sure what to do and you may need to lead them to sharing their clues. It was a good exercise in communication and collaboration. Make sure you have enough time for any groups that may not complete the grid as quick.
As part of the preparation we did adapt the tool by including some of the titles in the box e.g. the 12 month goals and feedback and I am glad we did as quite a few participants had never used this style grid before and they still ended up getting bogged down in completing the grid - even with this additional help. It is important that they get time to discuss their first actions rather than just completing the grid.
The exercise highlights the importance of focusing on the positives within a team rather than spending time on the negatives.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I ran this exercise as an icebreaker for the launch workshop of a new Management Development Program. It worked well to get the participants working together, although there was a period of time at the start where no one seemed to know what they had to do, which was slightly uncomfortable as the participants didn't all know each other. I dealt with this by saying "someone in the team knows what to do".
The different approaches taken by the two team was interesting. One team tackled it exactly as I would - filling out all the categories and then cross-referencing the information to complete the grid. The other team were focused on going through each name and trying to complete the whole information one person at a time. I was sure this wouldn't work, but somehow it did! I think they must have made the connections by reading out the info several times. It was useful to bring out a learning point about letting people tackle problems in their own way, and that my way is not always the only way! I did drop in some helpful comments, e.g. steering them away from guessing at answers and telling them that all the facts they needed were provided.
On the less positive side, the "feedback" items and goals are not super clear and took a bit of working out.
A good exercise to lead into a discussion of managing vs leading though and I will definitely be using it again.
One other small point - if the size of the cards could be made the same on all the sheets that would make me happy!
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
We used this module to set the tone for a leadership programme targeted at new leaders.
The group did not know one another so it served well as an ice-breaker. But more importantly it set the tone for our discussion around the differences between leading and managing. Previously we started this programme without this exercise and there was a lot of confusion around the differing roles of managers and leaders.
The materials are set out really well, though I would recommend plenty of spares as participants tended to request additional grids as they made errors.
Also, I think be clear about what you are trying to achieve. If your priority is completion of the activity then the time limit is great. If you would like more focus around the actual debate of “who your priorities are” then I would suggest the facilitator assists more and more so that they have around 10-15mins for discussion at completion of the grid, however each group is different.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To identify the key 'don't' when using counselling skills at work.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 10 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To identify the key 'don't' when using counselling skills at work. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of almost any size. Useful For: Managers. You'll Need: • Glue or double sided sticky tape.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the characteristics and differences between constructive feedback, praise and criticism. • To explain the importance of constructive feedback. • To build awareness of "good practice" guidelines for providing constructive feedback.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To build an understanding of the characteristics and differences between constructive feedback, praise and criticism. • To explain the importance of constructive feedback. • To build awareness of "good practice" guidelines for providing constructive feedback. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants. Useful For: Supervisors and first time managers. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Endorsed by The National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers, NASBTT.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Loved the true and false bit at the beginning with statements about feedback. Really got the managers thinking to begin with. Then going in to specific language used to give feedback was really useful and gave managers specific tips to take away and practice in their work. The practice element was really useful especially for inexpereinced team leaders. Would definitely use this again!
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Used this exercise with a group of managers, who were quiet senior but not accustomed to managing others. They found the initial true or false quiz a little too ‘obvious’ (although that might be because of the seniority of the group). However, the section on developing good practice guidelines worked well – especially as it was an in-house course. It certainly revealed a lot about the culture of feedback in the organisation. (So in that respect could be useful as an assessment tool when working with organisations over a time period).
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
We frequently use the material provided about 'Feedback' asking our group members to complete the true false quiz sheet. This provides a good starting point for discussions about 'what feedback is'. We find the four areas to consider when giving feedback helpful for our learners as it gives them a framework to work within.
|
Jean Arnold
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 65 minutes.
Aims: • To provide participants with a way of understanding behaviour and improving communication. • To provide a very basic introduction to transactional analysis.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 65 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To provide participants with a way of understanding behaviour and improving communication. • To provide a very basic introduction to transactional analysis.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff up to junior managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module is intended to provide a very simple introduction to transactional analysis, a theory developed by Eric Berne in the 1950s. If you are not familiar with transactional analysis you will need to read through all the notes carefully plus the additional material in the handout. Go through the exercises on your own first so that you can see the rationale. If you have time, try to observe the different types "in play" in your own interactions with people.
Endorsed by The National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers, NASBTT.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Great simple introduction to Transnational Analysis, helping individuals see what their dominant ego state may be and how they communicate may influence a particular response. I have used this for an introduction to management, communication skills and assertiveness courses. I also have two sets of three circles laminated and place them on the floor to get some movement through the ego states - gets people thinking about where they are communicating from and therefore what invitation they are giving others. Simple yet powerful!
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Straight forward introduction to TA that you can pick up and
run with. The check for
understanding exercise is good as people can ‘see’ TA in action. And the
dominant states exercise was good.
Personally I added a little bit about the functional model
as I find it helps people get their minds around the positive and negative
parent and child states. But that
was easy to add into this activity.
The complementary or crossed communications exercise was helpful, and again
to make it a little more practical I gave them discs and sticks and got them to map out the transactions to
help their thinking process with each example. Found this worked well.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I used this material in a coaching workshop for managers. The exercise was used in the context of giving effective feedback and what problems may occur when our communication style is crossed rather than parallel to the person we’re working with. It is structured such that the topic of transactional analysis is very easy to understand and everyone was able to identify with the states of being an Adult, Child or Parent. It begins with an exercise to consider what your reactions would be in five situations - which you later come back to and label the state in which you responded – many people were surprised that many of their immediate reactions were very much in a Child state! I followed this exercise with a coaching role-play, where the manager had to give feedback to an ‘employee’ about his/her performance which helped the participants to use a more appropriate state when giving feedback.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To identify where resilience comes from and what makes people resilient. • To understand how and why different people have different levels of resilience. • To introduce six keys to personal resilience.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To identify where resilience comes from and what makes people resilient. • To understand how and why different people have different levels of resilience. • To introduce six keys to personal resilience.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff and managers at all levels.
You'll Need: • Coloured post-it notes. • A set of six cut-keys and labels (from the template provided) for each team. • String and blu-tack. • Enough clear wall space for each team within the group to be able to put up, and move around, lots of post-it notes.
Notes: This module can be used as a stand-alone module but is also a great way to introduce various topics that you might want to go on to explore in greater detail. It helps participants understand the wide range of factors that can influence an individual’s levels of resilience. If you are going to move on to look at the six keys to personal resilience in greater detail then you may wish to leave out the final exercise. In this case you should be able to complete the module in 60 minutes.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This is a powerful activity and worth the time it takes. Make sure you have it really clear in your mind how it works, creates a lot of discussion and sharing.
|
Clare Bell
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the benefits of different approaches to developing others. • To help participants choose the most appropriate approach for developing others in a given situation.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore the benefits of different approaches to developing others. • To help participants choose the most appropriate approach for developing others in a given situation.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Team Leaders, supervisors and managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module is suitable for anyone who has responsibility for developing others in the workplace: Team leaders, supervisors or managers. It is a useful addition to coaching skills courses and can help participants understand when a coaching approach might be appropriate and when it might not be.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Great short exercise to help leaders to manage their approach to various members of their team. I used it as part of a 2 day course on Coaching in the Workplace most recently.
|
Lottie Skuthe-Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Great simple explanation and activity that helps managers to assess which technique of development to use in different situations with different individuals in their team. Simple and effective way of getting managers to reflect on their own team using generic scenarios. Great introduction to Coaching skills for managers course or team development.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To provide participants an opportunity to review and ‘continuously’ improve their performance. • To illustrate the importance of a continuous improvement process. • To recognise behaviours that can get in the way of continuous improvement.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes for completion.
Aims: • To provide participants an opportunity to review and ‘continuously’ improve their performance. • To illustrate the importance of a continuous improvement process. • To recognise behaviours that can get in the way of continuous improvement.
Group Size: This activity can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Anyone.
You'll Need: • One of each of the three Puzzle Stars and set of letters for every team in play. • To cut out the missing letters for each of the Puzzle Stars and place each set in an envelope (or similar). • A stopwatch or timer for each team in play. • A small prize for the winning team (optional).
Notes: This activity works best when participants are split into teams of 2 or 3. There are two versions of this module – this one focuses on Continuous Improvement and the other version called ‘The Problem with Letters’ focuses on Problem Solving skills.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the challenge when solving a problem where a number of people are involved, particularly when those people may have other obligations that mean they can’t give your problem their complete attention.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 40 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore the challenge when solving a problem where a number of people are involved, particularly when those people may have other obligations that mean they can’t give your problem their complete attention.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of almost any size. Where you have more than 12 participants, you should consider splitting your group and running two versions of the exercise separately in tandem.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A stopwatch.
Notes: This exercise requires a minimum of 6 participants. Where you have more than 12 participants, you should consider splitting your group and running two versions of the exercise separately in tandem. It is important that all of the cards are distributed and that every participant has a card but some participants can receive more cards than others – in fact it’s better if they do.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To give participants an opportunity to reflect on their current skill levels as a manager and use the information to create a plan of action.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To give participants an opportunity to reflect on their current skill levels as a manager and use the information to create a plan of action.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of any size.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently).
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This exercise can work as a stand-alone exercise but is best used as a precursor or a final exercise in a longer programme for new managers.
Label
Reviews |
|
This exercise is a really good way of getting managers to rate their skill sets honestly and access how successful they have been in different areas. Then to share the information with their manager and from that create an action plan for future development. They all were pleasantly surprised by the scores that came back from their teams when they sent them out.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage new managers to think about which of their team members they are most worried about managing and begin to identify actions they can take to manage them effectively.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage new managers to think about which of their team members they are most worried about managing and begin to identify actions they can take to manage them effectively.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Brand new managers (or those who soon will be), and particularly those that have been promoted from within the team.
You'll Need: • Post-it notes, glue, sellotape and Blu Tack. • Playdough or other modelling clay. • Large flat (plain) wooden lolly sticks. • Colourful pipe cleaners. • Art equipment.
Notes: This is an introductory module or icebreaker for new managers. It is designed to build awareness of participants’ fears and concerns, gather initial ideas and explore the personal learning each participant needs to get from the training that follows. If using this module with larger groups, more time will be needed for debriefing the exercise; alternatively, you can ask them to work in pairs during the exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this activity as an introduction exercise to Managing Difficult People which works really well, gets individual to relax into talking about the challenging people/situations they are facing without having to get too specific and gets some energy and fun in to a fairly emotive subject.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To explore what motivates us. • To identify ways of maintaining motivation.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To explore what motivates us. • To identify ways of maintaining motivation. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: • A pre-prepared flipchart and coloured flipchart pens. Notes: For this module, you will need to pre-prepare a flipchart with a grid (an example is shown on the summary sheet of the trainer's notes). Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A great exercise for developing learning around motivation and the motivational theories. It really highlights what is a motivator and the group scoring exercise supports the theorists. We also looked at Maslow's hierarchy and Vrooms Expectancy theory.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I really enjoyed using this Motivators exercise in a Managing Good Performance course I ran. It really starts to get delegates to understand their own motivators and how they can use this to support their teams motivators!
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
The discussion questions worked really well! As did the ranking exercise – that really demonstrated the different priorities we have. I had already done some work with the groups that I used this with around personality types and their answers to the ranking exercised helped endorse this work too! I did find a great sample slide on the internet showing the hygiene and motivating factors that really brought Hertzberg to
life. Easy to use, experiential activity great for managers of all levels!
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Used this exercise on management programmes to help delegates understand that there are a number of factors which affect our inherent motivation. It builds very well on understanding different people styles as then the group can understand why there are variances in their responses. Again, as with so many other modules, the exercise was simple in execution, did not need "specialist" equipment and provided the learning points easily and readily. This exercise generates great discussion around motivation and how, as managers, we need to tap into something beyond just financial reward.
|
Rosemary Taylor
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to identify an appropriate management style based on the individual they are dealing with, the role they are doing and what the team needs them to do.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to identify an appropriate management style based on the individual they are dealing with, the role they are doing and what the team needs them to do.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Participants who have managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently).
You'll Need: • Post it notes and Blu-Tack. • Lengths of string about 1 metre/3 feet long. (You’ll need two lengths for each team of 3 or 4 participants.) • Plenty of space.
Notes: This exercise can work as a stand-alone training exercise for new managers. It is designed to look at the role of the manager and explore suitable approaches for managing individual team members. You will need to clear a large space (on the floor or on tables) for the main part of the exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
We recently launched a new management programme and we ran this activity, it was a really great way for them to understand their people and help them create an action plan for themselves in their new role.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Used this with a group of young managers. Worked well. Would comment that there are a lot of parts of this module, and it's easy to run longer than indicated.
|
Rob Pyne
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To understand the importance of setting clear performance objectives for team members. • To understand what makes an objective SMART.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 35 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand the importance of setting clear performance objectives for team members. • To understand what makes an objective SMART.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • 2 clipboards with pens for the assessors. • 2 copies of the Assessor’s Brief, each sealed in a separate envelope. • A copy of the handout for every participant. • A stopwatch.
Notes: For managers, we strongly recommend following this module with Using SMART Objectives , which will give participants an opportunity to create SMART objectives for specific members of their team.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library called Objectives - Introducing SMART.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To define aims, goals and objectives. • To identify the purpose of goal setting. • To introduce a six-step model for goal setting. • To enable participants to practise goal setting. • To identify and discuss some tools and techniques that support setting and achieving goals.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 100 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 180 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To define aims, goals and objectives. • To identify the purpose of goal setting. • To introduce a six-step model for goal setting. • To enable participants to practise goal setting. • To identify and discuss some tools and techniques that support setting and achieving goals. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: Although the whole module may take 3 or more hours to run, this is comprised of several smaller sessions that can, if necessary and appropriate, be separated. This module is appropriate for anyone who needs to set and achieve goals in the workplace, their career or their personal life. You may find it helpful to work through the definitions set out in the first session and apply them to a goal of your own, so that you have a personal example to share with participants if they are a little reluctant to discuss their own goals. Session four is a long session (2 hours) that takes participants through the goal setting process and allows time for them to define and describe in detail their goal(s). It is split into several sub-sections (linked to the stages of goal setting) for ease of use. The timing of a break is suggested but it may be taken at any time during this session, as convenient for the group.
Label
Reviews |
|
This a simple goals setting activity which works however I found bits of it a bit long winded. Great for SMART goal seeting for managers new to managing. It is very thorough and sets out a good process for SMART goals.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
In defining goal setting I added in an essence exercise to get people to generate their own definitions, and a more practical demonstration of why goals are important (as otherwise I found it a bit too passive/sedentary). However, I really liked the way the module describes aim, goal and objective and the section on accentuating the positive (though I adapted the slide examples to suit my personal style). The final section on actually implementing goal setting was good. Some delegates found it really difficult, but the framework provided by this module helped most learners grasp the stages. All in all a good all encompassing look at why and how to set effective goals.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants consider the extent to which they engage in change. • To help those involved in change consider how they could make the change journey easier for themselves, and others. • To help those involved in a change plan.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To help participants consider the extent to which they engage in change. • To help those involved in change consider how they could make the change journey easier for themselves, and others. • To help those involved in a change plan.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 16 participants.
Useful For: Anyone involved in change, either as a leader, or a follower.
You'll Need: • A toy steering wheel for the ‘driver’ would be a fun prop, but is not essential. • A clipboard (or A4 piece of thick card) for each participant would be useful. • Flipchart paper and pens.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I run a Leadership Network Support group and they requested a session on Change Management and how to best engage their teams in the change. After finding Passengers in Trainer's Library, I couldn't wait to run the session!
I had 24 Team Leaders and Managers, 12 in the room face-to-face and 12 virtually in Teams. I split them in 4 groups and allocated one seat to each and asked them to discuss how would their journey feel for them and the pros and cons of their seat. They started making connections to their roles and their own experiences of change in their teams straight away and the discussions were very meaningful and insightful. They were extremely engaged with the activity and they couldn't wait to hear what the other passengers in their journey were feeling. After listening to each group sharing their key discussion points, I asked them to now consider what they could do to make their own journey more comfortable as well as making the other passenger's journeys better; that's when the flurry of ideas came about and everyone was so animated! Once everyone shared their ideas, I asked them to focus on a big change project that our company is going to go through in the next few months so we could all apply the learnings to a real case scenario. Each department got together and they created an action plan to ensure every one in their teams were involved, engaged, communicated with, asked to share their expertise and identify project improvements, etc. They all left the room motivated and excited about putting things into practice. A few people stayed behind to thank me for a very insightful and enjoyable activity and I received fantastic feedback.
I wholeheartedly recommend this activity and I'll certainly be using it again and again!
|
Rene Garcia-Evans
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this activity with a team of 28 managers to explore different perspectives about change. The room set up really sparked interest and there was a lot of laughter as we began the activity. Then as people started to rotate around the seats and read the different thoughts of people, everything went quiet. The review was brilliant - so much learning about understanding how people experience change and the different viewpoints triggered so much discussion. I followed up with SARAH's change video to complete the lesson and in the end of day wash up, Passengers got the most mentions for learning to take back to work. This will definitely become a regular feature in my future sessions. Thank you!
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the role goals can play in helping a positive mental attitude and resilience. • To consider why goals can help or hinder our resilience and how to ensure our goals help us move forward positively.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 30 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To consider the role goals can play in helping a positive mental attitude and resilience. • To consider why goals can help or hinder our resilience and how to ensure our goals help us move forward positively.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This activity encourages participants to reflect on a personal goal. It’s important therefore that their right to privacy is respected and that participants are invited rather than asked to share their thoughts, insights and ideas.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the things they need to do before conducting a performance review. • To consider the importance of effective planning before a performance review. • To identify questions that should be asked in a review, and to recognise the importance of thinking in advance about open, constructive questions that can be used in the review.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 40 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the things they need to do before conducting a performance review. • To consider the importance of effective planning before a performance review. • To identify questions that should be asked in a review, and to recognise the importance of thinking in advance about open, constructive questions that can be used in the review.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and above.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This case study based exercise encourages participants to really think about how they'd prepare for a performance review and highlights some potential barriers to effective performance appraisal reviews.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore different styles of leadership and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. • To understand how to successfully apply each of the leadership styles, as appropriate, in the workplace.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore different styles of leadership and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. • To understand how to successfully apply each of the leadership styles, as appropriate, in the workplace.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Team leaders, managers and those aspiring to management roles.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: For this module you will need sufficient space for participants to work together in small teams.
Label
Reviews |
|
As part of our Leadership vs Management workshop I used this to help embed the different styles of Leadership that can be used. There were really good discussions around the styles with most attendees talking about their preferred style. The case study really helped everyone to see the differences and the potential impacts when using them. It really highlighted the need to adapt your style depending on the circumstances and encourages you to look at the big picture and what you want to achieve. Would definitely recommend for leadership training.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I found this case study, well written and it evoked good discussion amongst our Leadership Team. Different sessions sometimes found it hard to distinguish between Autocratic/Transactional, but an experienced trainer was able to talk through each one highlighting the “give-away” points to reach consensus. The case study is long & detailed enough to be used in adult/corporate education, yet short enough to move through the exercise within a given timeframe. I didn’t use all the discussion questions and we didn’t focus on what Nicola “should” do. Instead I wrote the Learning Points on a flipchart (rather than the handout) and added one about our company working as a team and Leaders can get the best out of a situation when they work with everyone’s strengths. Our summative task after the case study was to look at the different leadership styles and when they are appropriate within our organization.
|
Preayant Kumar
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Looking at leadership styles/approaches through the use of a case study. An experienced facilitator can work wonders with this exercise, enabling students to talk about leadership styles. For example, I had one group who said they didn't like the "transformational leader", but when we explored this further, they realised it wasn't what she was suggesting that they didn't like, it was more that the situation she was trying to help someone else resolve had been badly managed and could have done with a transformational approach from the start. This exercise promotes good discussion amongst the groups, and it's really important to allow time for this to happen before you bring students back together for their views and debrief. I handed out the "Learning Points handout" but students didn't fill this in as they had already been asked to record their group views during their discussion (it seemed like duplicate work). However, the handout would be useful if you wanted students to take more time to reflect on their own styles and spend a few quiet minutes making their own notes. I didn't go through every discussion question with the group, as suggested on the trainer's notes - partly because I was timebound, but partly because I thought there were too many questions. I found it useful to focus on a couple of key questions about each leader and then to encourage students to reflect and comment on their own styles. The exercise more than ably makes the point that an "adaptive" leadership style is best. It can be done comfortably within 60 minutes. The case study was short enough for students to digest.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I love this case study and have used it many times with all different levels of managers. I tend to send them away into break out rooms in teams to create flip chart presentations on their views on the three different styles (pro’s & con’s) and what Nicola should do (their plan of action) for half an hour in total. The teams then present all the styles pros and cons back to the group and we all discuss KLPs. After that they each present their plans of action for Nicola and we discuss as a group. I’ve found it quicker this way and easier to manage and they all seem to find this a realistic and useful discussion about adaptive leadership. It also allows them to gently nickname each other a bit of a “Steve” or a “Jenny” and have a laugh while recognising their differing strengths and weaknesses.
|
Melody McMillan
|
|
This module is EXCELLENT! I used it as part of a leadership skills course, but subsequently have also included in a Supervisory Skills course because it helps to explain so much about how we manage and how others see us. The case study has been brilliantly written so that each of the characters have very different qualities and can easily be identified! Using the module has led to vast amounts of conversation and learning and has really enhanced the course. I would advise changing the structure slightly, so that you cover each character in full, in turn. So layout at the moment goes through identifying each style, then identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each style. I have covered both elements under each character so that the conversation flows more. I have also had to allow slightly more time (having cut down t | | | |